Citation

Xue W, Zheng R, Yang B, Wang Z, Kaizuka T, Nakano K. J. Intell. Connect. Veh. 2019; 2(2): 67-77.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/JICV-06-2019-0007

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE Automated driving systems (ADSs) are being developed to avoid human error and improve driving safety. However, limited focus has been given to the fallback behavior of automated vehicles, which act as a fail-safe mechanism to deal with safety issues resulting from sensor failure. Therefore, this study aims to establish a fallback control approach aimed at driving an automated vehicle to a safe parking lane under perceptive sensor malfunction.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Owing to an undetected area resulting from a front sensor malfunction, the proposed ADS first creates virtual vehicles to replace existing vehicles in the undetected area. Afterward, the virtual vehicles are assumed to perform the most hazardous driving behavior toward the host vehicle; an adaptive model predictive control algorithm is then presented to optimize the control task during the fallback procedure, avoiding potential collisions with surrounding vehicles. This fallback approach was tested in typical cases related to car-following and lane changes.

FINDINGS It is confirmed that the host vehicle avoid collision with the surrounding vehicles during the fallback procedure, revealing that the proposed method is effective for the test scenarios.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE This study presents a model for the path-planning problem regarding an automated vehicle under perceptive sensor failure, and it proposes an original path-planning approach based on virtual vehicle scheme to improve the safety of an automated vehicle during a fallback procedure. This proposal gives a different view on the fallback safety problem from the normal strategy, in which the mode is switched to manual if a driver is available or the vehicle is instantly stopped.

Language: en

Keywords

Automated vehicles; Fallback; Model predictive control; Sensor failure; Virtual vehicle scheme