SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Li S, Blythe P, Guo W, Namdeo A, Edwards S, Goodman P, Hill G. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2019; 67: 78-100.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.009

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The ability to continue driving into old age is strongly associated with older adults' mobility and wellbeing for those that have been dependant on car use for most of their adult lives. The emergence of highly automated vehicles (HAVs) may have the potential to allow older adults to drive longer and safer. In HAVs, when operating in automated mode, drivers can be completely disengaged from driving, but occasionally they may be required to take back the control of the vehicle. The human-machine interfaces in HAVs play an important role in the safe and comfortable usage of HAVs. To date, only limited research has explored how to design age-friendly HMIs in HAVs and evaluate their effectiveness. This study designed three HMI concepts based on older drivers' requirements, and conducted a driving simulator investigation with 76 drivers (39 older drivers and 37 younger drivers) to evaluate the effect and relative merits of these HMIs on drivers' takeover performance, workload and attitudes.

RESULTS showed that the 'R + V' HMI (informing drivers of vehicle status together with providing the reasons for the manual driving takeover request) led to better takeover performance, lower perceived workload and highly positive attitudes, and is the most beneficial and effective HMI. In addition, The 'V' HMI (verbally informing the drivers about vehicle status, including automation mode and speed, before the manual driving takeover request) also had a positive effect on drivers' takeover performance, perceived workload and attitudes. However, the 'R' HMI (solely informing drivers about the reasons for takeover as part of the takeover request) affected older and younger drivers differently, and resulted in deteriorations in performance and more risky takeover for both older and younger drivers compared to the baseline HMI. Moreover, significant age difference was observed in the takeover performance and perceived workload. Above all, this research highlights the significance of taking account older drivers' requirements into the design of HAVs and the importance of collaboration between automated vehicle and cooperative ITS research communities.


Language: en

Keywords

Driving simulator; Highly automated vehicles; HMI, user requirements; Human factors; Human-machine interaction; Human-machine interfaces; Older drivers; Takeover control; Vehicle automation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print