SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sherick DG, Buchman SR, Patel PP. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1997; 38(6): 578-84; di.

Affiliation

Department of General Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9188972

Abstract

This study reviews all pediatric facial fractures treated operatively at the C.S. Mott Children's Hospital of the University of Michigan over a 5-year period. Previous series of pediatric facial fractures have been collected at large urban centers and may not be representative of all practice environments. Our institution is a level 1 trauma center that serves a patient population primarily from suburban and rural regions throughout the state. Referral and practice patterns at our institution gave us an important opportunity to analyze differences in patient care and management secondary to venue, and challenge the assumptions made by studies collected at large urban centers. We reviewed 80 fractures in 62 patients. Patient age ranged from 2 to 18 years old with the majority of patients (58%) between 15 and 18 years old. Most fractures resulted from motor vehicle accidents (43%) and there were no firearm injuries. Fracture sites included the mandible (38%), the frontonasoethmoid region (35%), the midface (17%), and the orbit (10%). Only two operative complications were reported. There were no cervical spine injuries. Median patient age was higher and mechanism of injury differed in our study compared with urban studies. Rapid changes in the health care delivery system and the emergence of managed care demand accurate demographic updates for the efficient allocation of valuable resources. Our results showed important differences with previous studies and imply that assumptions and analysis of the care of pediatric facial fractures based solely on data collected at large urban centers may be too parochial, and therefore subsequent health care decisions of resource allocation arrived at without respect to practice environment could be erroneous.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print