SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Khavandegar A, Salamati P, Zafarghandi M, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Fakharian E, Saeed-Banadaky SH, Hoseinpour V, Sadeghian F, Nasr Isfahani M, Rahmanian V, Ghadiphasha A, Pourmasjedi S, Piri SM, Mirzamohamadi S, Hassan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS, Naghdi K, Baigi V. Sci. Rep. 2024; 14(1): e7646.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4

PMID

38561381

Abstract

Hereby, we aimed to comprehensively compare different scoring systems for pediatric trauma and their ability to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The current registry-based multicenter study encompassed a comprehensive dataset of 6709 pediatric trauma patients aged ≤ 18 years from July 2016 to September 2023. To ascertain the predictive efficacy of the scoring systems, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. A total of 720 individuals (10.7%) required admission to the ICU. The mortality rate was 1.1% (n = 72). The most predictive scoring system for in-hospital mortality was the adjusted trauma and injury severity score (aTRISS) (AUC = 0.982), followed by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) (AUC = 0.980), new trauma and injury severity score (NTRISS) (AUC = 0.972), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (AUC = 0.9546), revised trauma score (RTS) (AUC = 0.944), pre-hospital index (PHI) (AUC = 0.936), injury severity score (ISS) (AUC = 0.901), new injury severity score (NISS) (AUC = 0.900), and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) (AUC = 0.734). Given the predictive performance of the scoring systems for ICU admission, NTRISS had the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.837), followed by aTRISS (AUC = 0.836), TRISS (AUC = 0.823), ISS (AUC = 0.807), NISS (AUC = 0.805), GCS (AUC = 0.735), RTS (AUC = 0.698), PHI (AUC = 0.662), and AIS (AUC = 0.651). In the present study, we concluded the superiority of the TRISS and its two derived counterparts, aTRISS and NTRISS, compared to other scoring systems, to efficiently discerning individuals who possess a heightened susceptibility to unfavorable consequences. The significance of these findings underscores the necessity of incorporating these metrics into the realm of clinical practice.


Language: en

Keywords

Children; Glasgow coma scale (GCS); Injury severity score; Pediatric trauma score; Survival prediction model; Trauma and injury severity score; Trauma scoring system

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print