Citation

Li SQ. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2024; 15(1): e102287.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2024, Ain Shams University, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.asej.2023.102287

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

To explore the vulnerability of a reinforced concrete girder bridge and reinforced concrete building during an earthquake, and to compare the difference in the seismic capacity of the two types of engineering structures, the nonlinear vulnerability numerical and probabilistic model analysis methods were combined. Overall, 1069 reinforced concrete girder bridges and 949 reinforced concrete buildings damaged in the Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008 were selected for vulnerability analysis. The vulnerability grades of damaged samples were evaluated according to the Chinese seismic intensity scale (CSIS-08), and the vulnerability matrix of reinforced concrete girder bridges and reinforced concrete buildings in multiple intensity regions was established. Moreover, the novel vulnerability comparison curve model was developed by considering the failure ratio and exceeding probability. The anomaly characteristics of seismic damage vulnerability between reinforced concrete girder bridges and reinforced concrete buildings under the influence of age, seismic design, the coupling of age and seismic design, and foundation type factors were compared and analysed. By employing the matrix calculation model of the mean damage index, the matrix and curve comparison model of the mean damage index vulnerability parameters of reinforced concrete girder bridges and reinforced concrete buildings in multiple intensity zones were developed.

Language: en

Keywords

Empirical seismic vulnerability; Mean damage index matrix model; Reinforced concrete building; Reinforced concrete girder bridge; Vulnerability comparison