Citation

Gutenson JL, Tavakoly AA, Islam MS, Wing OEJ, Lehman WP, Hamilton CO, Wahl MD, Massey TC. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2023; 23(1): 261-277.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2023, Copernicus GmbH on behalf of the European Geosciences Union)

DOI

10.5194/nhess-23-261-2023

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The flooding brought about by compound coastal flooding events can be devastating. Before, during, and immediately following these events, flood inundation maps (FIMs) can provide essential information to emergency management. However, there are a number of frameworks capable of estimating FIMs during flood events. In this article, we evaluate FIMs derived from three such frameworks in the context of Hurricane Harvey. Our analysis reveals that each of the three FIM frameworks provides different FIMs that differ in their level of accuracy. Each of the three FIMs also produces different exposure and consequence estimates because of their spatial differences. This investigation highlights the need for a centralized means of vetting and adjudicating multiple FIMs during compound flood events empowered by the ability to distribute FIMs as geographic information system (GIS) services and coalesce FIMs into a common operating picture. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the ability to produce multi-model estimates of FIMs to create probabilistic FIMs may provide a better product than the use of a lone FIM.

Language: en