SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mitchell HK, Keim G, Apple DE, Lett E, Zisk A, Dowshen NL, Yehya N. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2022; 6(12): 876-884.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00280-2

PMID

36402163

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transgender and non-binary young people experience discrimination that has been linked to suicidal ideation and self-harm, but few studies have examined this association systematically. We aimed to study the association between gender dysphoria-related diagnostic coding and hospital admission for suicidality or self-harm in a large representative pediatric inpatient database from the USA.

METHODS: Using the 2016 and 2019 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), we identified transgender and non-binary young people (aged 6-20 years) with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes related to gender dysphoria. We identified suicidal ideation using explicit suicidality ICD-10 codes, and self-harm using 355 self-harm ICD-10 codes. Prevalence of suicidality (primary outcome), self-harm, and the combination of suicidality and self-harm (secondary outcomes) was compared between young people with and without gender dysphoria-related codes. Univariable and multivariable regression was used to test for an association between gender dysphoria and suicidality, self-harm, or suicidality and self-harm combined.

FINDINGS: 1 090 544 individuals were included from KID 2016 and 1 026 752 from KID 2019. Gender dysphoria-related diagnoses were prevalent in 161 per 100 000 hospital admissions in KID 2016 and 475 per 100 000 hospital admissions in KID 2019. In KID 2016 and KID 2019, among individuals who were White, privately insured, or from higher median income ZIP code areas, proportionately more had gender dysphoria-related codes. Prevalence of suicidality was greater in individuals with gender dysphoria-related codes than in individuals without gender dysphoria-related codes in KID 2016 (635 [36%] of 1755 individuals with gender dysphoria-related codes vs 55 351 [5%] of 1 088 789 individuals without gender dysphoria-related codes; unadjusted prevalence ratio [PR] 7·19 [95% CI 6·75-7·66]) and KID 2019 (2680 [55%] of 4872 individuals with gender dysphoria-related codes vs 38 831 [4%] of 1 021 880 individuals without gender dysphoria-related codes; unadjusted PR 5·45 [5·30-5·60]). This association persisted in multivariable modelling adjusting for confounders in KID 2016 (adjusted PR 5·02 [95% CI 4·67-5·41]) and KID 2019 (4·14 [4·02-4·28]). Increased unadjusted and adjusted PRs for individuals with gender dysphoria-related codes, relative to those without, were also evident for self-harm and when combining suicidality and self-harm in both the 2016 and 2019 datasets.

INTERPRETATION: In a large representative national sample, transgender and non-binary young people with gender dysphoria-related diagnoses were frequently admitted to hospital for suicidality or self-harm. The lower rates of gender-dysphoria-related codes among young people who were non-White, publicly insured, and from low-income households suggest that underlying inequities might shape the identification and management of gender dysphoria. Structural and health-care provider-level interventions are needed to reduce discrimination and expand gender-affirming competencies to prevent adverse outcomes for hospitalised transgender and non-binary young people with gender dysphoria. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print