SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chen S, Wang H, Xiao L, Meng Q. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022; 160: e102650.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.tre.2022.102650

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In this study, we concentrate on the random capacity of a single lane in the context of mixed traffic flow with both autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs). We first revisit and enrich the bound estimation of the random lane capacity. We proceed to rigorously investigate the non-negligible gap between two widely-used approximate mean capacity functions and their generalized function. The analysis results show that the improper use of approximate mean capacity functions in AV-HV traffic assignment and road network planning could lead to biased and even misleading decisions. Lastly, we explore the probability distribution of the random lane capacity using simulation and distribution fitting techniques, where both fixed and random headway scenarios with different AV shares are addressed. Six suitable probability distributions for the random lane capacity are identified, and the top three are Log-Pearson 3, Log-Gamma, and Lognormal distributions.


Language: en

Keywords

Autonomous vehicle; Capacity bound; Human-driven vehicle; Mean capacity gap; Probability distribution of lane capacity; Random lane capacity

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print