SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Marques AP, Ramke J, Cairns J, Butt T, Zhang JH, Jones I, Jovic M, Nandakumar A, Faal H, Taylor H, Bastawrous A, Braithwaite T, Resnikoff S, Khaw PT, Bourne R, Gordon I, Frick K, Burton MJ. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 46: e101354.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101354

PMID

35340626

PMCID

PMC8943414

Abstract

Vision impairment (VI) can have wide ranging economic impact on individuals, households, and health systems. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and summarise the costs associated with VI and its major causes. We searched MEDLINE (16 November 2019), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the Health Technology Assessment database (12 December 2019) for partial or full economic evaluation studies, published between 1 January 2000 and the search dates, reporting cost data for participants with VI due to an unspecified cause or one of the seven leading causes globally: cataract, uncorrected refractive error, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, corneal opacity, trachoma. The search was repeated on 20 January 2022 to identify studies published since our initial search. Included studies were quality appraised using the British Medical Journal Checklist for economic submissions adapted for cost of illness studies.

RESULTS were synthesized in a structured narrative. Of the 138 included studies, 38 reported cost estimates for VI due to an unspecified cause and 100 reported costs for one of the leading causes. These 138 studies provided 155 regional cost estimates. Fourteen studies reported global data; 103/155 (66%) regional estimates were from high-income countries. Costs were most commonly reported using a societal (n = 48) or healthcare system perspective (n = 25). Most studies included only a limited number of cost components. Large variations in methodology and reporting across studies meant cost estimates varied considerably. The average quality assessment score was 78% (range 35-100%); the most common weaknesses were the lack of sensitivity analysis and insufficient disaggregation of costs. There was substantial variation across studies in average treatment costs per patient for most conditions, including refractive error correction (range $12-$201 ppp), cataract surgery (range $54-$3654 ppp), glaucoma (range $351-$1354 ppp) and AMD (range $2209-$7524 ppp). Future cost estimates of the economic burden of VI and its major causes will be improved by the development and adoption of a reference case for eye health. This could then be used in regular studies, particularly in countries with data gaps, including low- and middle-income countries in Asia, Eastern Europe, Oceania, Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.


Language: en

Keywords

Systematic review; Public health; AMD, Age- related macular degeneration; anti-VEGF, antivascular endothelial growth factor; DALYs, Disability Adjusted Life Years; DR, Diabetic Retinopathy; EU, European; GBD, Global Burden of Disease; Health economics; ICD 11, International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death 11th revision; LMICs, Low Middle Income Countries; MSVI, Moderate and Severe Vision Impairment; NR, Not reported; Ophthalmology; PPP, Purchasing power parity; QALYs, Quality Adjusted Life Years; RE, Refractive Error; USD, United States Dollars ($); VI, Vision Impairment; WHO, World Health Organization

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print