SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hartley M, Bartels RM. Sex. Abuse 2022; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2022, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/10790632211062188

PMID

35259025

Abstract

This study examined whether the attitudinal responses toward child sexual abuse (CSA) differ due to the person's relationship with the victim (intrafamilial vs. extrafamilial) and/or proximity to the victim (close vs. distant). An online sample of 292 participants completed a measure assessing pre-existing attitudes toward people who commit sexual offenses, before being randomly presented with a vignette describing a CSA case committed by a biological father, biological uncle, babysitter, stranger, or stepfather. Participants then rated the perpetrator's level of dangerousness and pedophilic interest, their own feelings of disgust, and their punitive judgments. Controlling for pre-existing attitudes, the extrafamilial cases (stranger and babysitter) were perceived to be more dangerous (large effects; ds >.50) and more pedophilic than the stepfather (large effects; ds >.60). Also, participants reported greater levels of disgust toward the stranger than both the babysitter and uncle (medium effects; ds >.30). The findings demonstrate the need to account for the established heterogeneity of men who commit CSA when studying the public's attitudinal responses.

METHODological limitations and suggestions for future research are also discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

child sexual abuse; attitudes; extrafamilial; intrafamilial; public perception; victim–perpetrator relationship

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print