Citation

Bullinger LR, Fleckman JM, Fong K. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2021; 42: 101015.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101015

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has been shown to have positive benefits for children. Families may face fewer barriers to accessing food they can purchase with their benefits if more stores in their neighborhoods accept SNAP benefits. We examine whether proximity to stores accepting SNAP benefits is related to child maltreatment (abuse and neglect) reports, particularly those potentially related to food insecurity. We combine geographically identified child maltreatment report data from the state of Connecticut from 2011 through 2015 with state SNAP-authorized retailer data. Using within-Census block group changes in the presence of a SNAP-authorized store, we find that in large, rural areas, one additional SNAP store is associated with a 4.4 percent decrease in the child maltreatment report rate (p < 0.05), and an 11.3 percent decrease in substantiated cases of maltreatment (p < 0.10), even net of changing zip code level factors and time-invariant neighborhood characteristics. The relationship between a neighborhood SNAP store and child maltreatment reports in these rural areas is largely driven by neglect, concentrated among young and school-aged children (ages 0-9), and primarily due to fewer reports by medical personnel. We find no effects of a neighborhood SNAP store on child maltreatment reports in smaller, more densely populated neighborhoods. Sensitivity checks affirm these results.

RESULTS indicate the benefits of access to SNAP retailers on the child welfare system and child well-being more broadly, especially in rural areas.

Language: en

Keywords

Child abuse; Child neglect; Food insecurity; Nutrition assistance; SNAP