SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jokūbaitis A, Marciukaitis G, Valivonis J. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13(11): e2423.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/ma13112432

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Nowadays, prestressed concrete sleepers are the most common type of sleepers. In different countries all over the world prestressed concrete sleepers are designed with different shapes, with different types of prestressed reinforcement and arrangements in cross-section. Additionally, different manufacturing methods and techniques are used for prestressed concrete sleepers. These railway members are stiff, durable and can withstand heavy loads. Despite that, damaged or deteriorated prestressed concrete sleepers appear on railway tracks even before the end of their service life. Therefore, there is a need for better understanding of the behavior of different types of prestressed concrete sleepers to optimize their design. The rail seat section of the sleeper is the most affected part of sleeper. Therefore, analysis of experimental results of bearing capacity, cracking, and deformation of the rail seat section of sleeper under static and dynamic loads are provided in this article. Furthermore, different types, diameters, and anchoring methods of prestressed reinforcement were analyzed in this article. Additionally, comparison of experimental results of different types of prestressed concrete sleepers is discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

crack width; dynamic load; prestressed concrete; rail seat; railway sleepers

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print