SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Butterfield KM, Roberts KP, Feltis LE, Kocovski NL. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 2020; 58: 189-213.

Affiliation

Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.01.007

PMID

32169196

Abstract

The prevalence of "mindfulness" in popular media, academia, and professional circles is difficult to miss. Newspapers, magazines, online articles, clinical programs, podcasts, scholarly and professional meetings, sports organizations, and many other outlets focus on the benefits of mindfulness. Despite the intense focus on mindfulness in Western society, it is astonishing that the evidence base (i.e., documented, scholarly, peer-reviewed evaluations) for these programs is woefully inadequate. Varying definitions of what mindfulness is, what it entails, what specific benefits to psychological functioning are observed (if any), and inadequate scientific testing all contribute to a lean knowledge base. Evaluation of potential benefits of mindful practice with children is even more difficult because children are a more heterogeneous group than adults; the differing developmental levels are likely to have profound effects on the efficacy of mindfulness-based programming with children. We review these issues and provide an explanation of the strength of different kinds of evidence, with suggestions for (a) researchers who study mindfulness with children and (b) clinical professionals and educators interested in developing mindful attitudes and techniques with children.

© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Children; Experimental control; Intervention; Mindfulness; Program evaluation; Regulation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print