SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kornblith AE, Graf J, Addo N, Newton C, Callcut R, Grupp-Phelan J, Jaffe DM. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/acem.13959

PMID

32159909

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT), the reference standard for diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury (IAI), carries risk including ionizing radiation. CT-sparing clinical decision rules for children have relied heavily on physical examination, but they did not include Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST), which has emerged into widespread use during the past decade. We sought to determine the independent associations of physical examination, laboratory studies, and FAST with identification of IAI in children, and to compare the test characteristics of these diagnostic variables. We hypothesized FAST may add incremental utility to a physical examination alone to more accurately identify children who could forgo CT scan.

METHODS: We reviewed a large trauma database of all children with blunt torso trauma presenting to a freestanding pediatric emergency department during a 20-month period. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association of FAST, physical examination and selected laboratory data with IAI in children, and we compared the test characteristics of these variables.

RESULTS: Among 354 children, 50 (14%) had IAI. Positive FAST [OR, 14.8; 95% CI: 7.5 - 30.8] and positive physical examination [OR, 15.2; 95% CI: 7.7 - 31.7] were identified as independent predictors for IAI. Physical examination and FAST each had sensitivities of 74% (95% CI: 60-85%). Combining FAST and physical examination as (FAST-enhanced physical examination or exFAST), improved sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) over either test alone (sensitivity of 88% (95% CI: 76-96%) and NPV of 97.3% (95% CI: 94.5-98.7%)).

CONCLUSIONS: In children, FAST and physical examinations each predicted the identification of IAI. However, the combination of the two (exFAST) had greater sensitivity and NPV than either physical examination or FAST alone. This supports the use of exFAST in refining clinical predication rules in children with blunt torso trauma.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging; Abdominal Injuries/surgery; Ultrasonography; child

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print