SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ingram LA, Macauda M, Lauckner C, Robillard A. Am. J. Health Promot. 2019; 33(1): 87-96.

Affiliation

Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publications)

DOI

10.1177/0890117118779008

PMID

29860863

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine sexual, mobile technology, and sexting behaviors of college students.

DESIGN: A cross-sectional study design was employed. SETTING: Study sites were 2 universities in the southern United States. SUBJECTS: Data were collected from 254 participants via online survey of college students. MEASURES: The survey included 268 items inclusive of measures from previously validated sources. Variables for this study included technology ownership/use, online/mobile dating site use, sexting behaviors/attitudes, and sexual behaviors. In particular, the Sexting Attitudes Scale has been previously validated with other researchers providing comparative data. ANALYSIS: Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used for group comparisons. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine predictors of sexting behavior.

RESULTS: Of the 254 participants, over 80% had ever had sex, and participants were more likely to use condoms with partners who they were not in a committed relationship compared to those to whom they were committed (χ2 = 27.324, P =.0001). Seventy percent had ever sexted, and sexting attitudes ranged from approximately 80% agreeing that sexting is "risky" or can leave one "vulnerable" compared to 43% agreeing that sexting is "fun." Sexting was associated with having multiple sexual partners (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-4.47) and sexually transmitted infection testing history (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.03-4.18).

CONCLUSION: Study findings should be considered as interventionists plan sexual health and risk prevention programs for college students.


Language: en

Keywords

college students; mobile technology; sexting; sexual behavior; sexual health

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print