SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pearson C, Kim DS, Mika VH, Imran Ayaz S, Millis SR, Dunne R, Levy PD. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2018; 36(8): 1327-1331.

Affiliation

Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine St., Detroit, MI 48201, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Integrated Biosciences Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 6135 Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI 48202, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.033

PMID

29277493

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify health beliefs of emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions and how these affect ambulance (AMB) utilization.

METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients 18years or older, who presented to the ED of an urban, academic hospital with an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level of 4 or 5. Demographics, treatment, and disposition data were obtained along with self-administered surveys. Characteristics of patients with low acuity conditions who presented to the ED by AMB were compared to the patients who came to the ED by private transportation (PT). Data were analyzed with the chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS: A total of 197 patients (97 AMB and 100 PT) were enrolled. Compared to PT, AMB patients were more likely to: be insured (82% vs. 56%; p=0.000), have a primary care provider (62% vs. 44%; p=0.048), and lack a regular means of transportation (53% vs. 33%; p=0.005). Three surveys were used the SF-8, Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults [STOFHLA], and Health Belief Model [HBM]. Answers to HBM showed patients perceive that their illness required care within one hour of arrival (38% vs. 21%; p=0.04), have used an ambulance in the past year (76% vs. 33%; p=0.001) and to utilize an ambulance in the future for similar concerns (53% vs. 15%; p=0.000). AMB patients were more likely to call an ambulance for any health concern (p=0.035) and felt that there were enough ambulances for all patients in the city (p=0.01). There were no differences in age, employment, level of income and education, nor hospital admission rate between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use in low-acuity ED patients is associated with misperceptions regarding severity of illness and resource allocation as well as limited access to private transportation. Understanding patient perceptions of illness and other barriers to receiving care is imperative for the development of interventions aimed at enabling change in health behaviors such as the elective use of limited resources.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Emergency department visits; Low acuity conditions; Resource utilization

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print