SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rabiolo A, Sacconi R, Giuffrè C, Corbelli E, Carnevali A, Querques L, Sarraf D, Freund KB, Sadda S, Bandello F, Querques G. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2018; 12(Suppl 1): S46-S50.

Affiliation

*Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; †Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; ‡Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; §Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York; ¶Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; **Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; and ††Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Wolters Kluwer)

DOI

10.1097/ICB.0000000000000640

PMID

28937524

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a case of factitious self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy.

METHODS: A 29-year-old man presented to our clinic complaining of a step-wise progressive loss of vision that abruptly began in his left eye but then became bilateral. He underwent comprehensive ocular examination, including visual acuity testing, biomicroscopic, dilated funduscopic examination, structural optical coherence tomography, en face structural optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography.

RESULTS: Visual acuity was 20/200 in both eyes. Although the multimodal imaging was highly consistent with handheld laser-induced maculopathy, the patient continued to deny this behavior.

CONCLUSION: Self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy may be a novel manifestation of factitious disorder. Clinical suspicion for this should remain high in the presence of the signature multimodal retinal findings despite denial by the patient. This category of patients could benefit from psychiatric referral, to prevent further ocular or extra-ocular self-injury.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print