SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sadler AG, Booth BM, Torner JC, Mengeling MA. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2017; 60(11): 947-955.

Affiliation

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/ajim.22767

PMID

28857214

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether sexual assault in the military (SAIM) among active component and Reserve/National Guard servicewomen is more likely to occur in deployed or non-deployed locations; and which location poses greater risk for SAIM when time spent in-location is considered.

METHODS: A total of 1337 Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom era servicewomen completed telephone interviews eliciting socio-demographics, military and sexual assault histories, including attempted and completed sexual assault.

RESULTS: Half of the sample had been deployed (58%). Overall 16% (N = 245) experienced SAIM; a higher proportion while not deployed (15%; n = 208) than while deployed (4%; n = 52). However, the incidence of SAIM per 100 person-years was higher in deployed than in non-deployed locations: 3.5 vs 2.4. Active component and Reserve/National Guard had similar deployment lengths, but Reserve/National Guard had higher SAIM incidence rates/100 person-years (2.8 vs 4.0).

CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of servicewomen experienced SAIM while not deployed; however, adjusting for time in each location, servicewomen were at greater risk during deployment.

© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

deployment; garrison; military; sexual assault; women

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print