|
Citation
|
Al-Thani H, El-Menyar A, Pillay Y, Mollazehi M, Mekkodathil A, Consunji RJ. Air Med. J. 2017; 36(4): 188-192. |
|
Affiliation
|
Injury Prevention, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. |
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the presentations and outcomes of trauma patients transported by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) versus ground emergency medical services (GEMS).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of trauma registry data at a level I trauma center was conducted for patients transported by GEMS and HEMS between 2011 and 2013. Data were analyzed and categorized based on the mode of transportation.
RESULTS: A total of 4,596 trauma patients were admitted to the hospital with a mean age of 31 ± 15 years. Injured patients were transported to the trauma center by GEMS (93.3%) and HEMS (6.7%). The common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle crash (37%) and falls (25%). Compared with GEMS, patients transported by HEMS were characterized by having a greater injury severity, more proportion of traumatic brain injury, on-scene intubation, and a 2.5-fold higher mortality. However, the impact of mode of transportation on the hospital mortality among severely injured patients has disappeared after adjusting for potential confounders.
CONCLUSION: Patients transported by HEMS may have different characteristic features and outcomes when compared with GEMS. However, further work is needed to identify the subgroups of trauma patients who clearly benefit from the use of HEMS.
Copyright © 2017 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Language: en |