SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zelic KJ, Ciesla JA, Dickson KS, Hruska LC, Ciesla SN. Behav. Ther. 2017; 48(3): 403-412.

Affiliation

Kent State University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.013

PMID

28390502

Abstract

Co-rumination involves excessive dwelling on negative aspects of problems within a dyadic relationship (Rose, 2002). While research has focused on the tendency to co-ruminate within particular relationships, we were interested in examining the behavior of co-rumination outside the context of a preexisting relationship. Using an experimental manipulation of co-rumination, the primary goal of this study was to experimentally test the effects of co-rumination and examine its associations with negative and positive affectivity. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three interviewing style conditions: a co-ruminative style, a problem-solving style, or a distracting style.

RESULTS revealed that the co-rumination condition significantly differed from both the distraction and problem-solving conditions on overall negative affect, sadness, and anxiety, but not on hostility. There were no significant differences among groups on positive affect. In conclusion, this investigation revealed detrimental effects of co-ruminative behavior even between strangers.

Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

co-rumination; experimental manipulation; negative affect; positive affect

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print