SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Barker-Collo S, Theadom AM, Jones K, Feigin VL, Kahan M. Neuroepidemiology 2016; 47(1): 46-52.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Karger Publishers)

DOI

10.1159/000448403

PMID

27504965

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in healthcare administrative databases may underestimate the epidemiology of TBI. The present study examined the use of ICD-10 codes in a population-based New Zealand sample.

METHODS: TBI related ICD-codes within the New Zealand health database were examined for all incident cases from a population-based TBI sample (n = 1,369). Impact of age, gender, ethnicity, presence/absence of skull fracture, where the case was located (i.e., hospital) on receipt of an ICD code was examined.

RESULTS: Individuals who received a TBI-related ICD-code accounted for 18.6% of the studied population. The most frequent codes were brief loss of consciousness, head injury not otherwise specified, and concussion. Receipt of a code was not impacted by gender. Those with skull fracture (x03C7;2 (1) = 69.983, p < 0.001), and/or attending hospital (x03C7;2 (2) = 81.507, p < 0.001), and of older age (x03C7;2 (1) = 56.473, p < 0.001) were more likely to receive a code.

CONCLUSIONS: Reported incidence of TBI, when based upon health registration data, is likely to be a significant underestimate. Specific research needs to be conducted to identify the barriers to medical personnel implementing the ICD head injury codes and to identify ways in which the use of the codes can be improved.

© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print