SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Miura H, Itoh Y. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 2016; 87(1): 32-39.

Vernacular Title

暗示が目撃者の人物同定に与える影響――単独面通しとラインナップ手続きの比較

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Japanese Psychological Association, Publisher University of Tokyo Press)

DOI

10.4992/jjpsy.87.14073

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

There are two types of eyewitness-identification procedures: showups and lineups. Although the false identification rate of showups was considered to be higher than that of lineups, experimental research has not always supported the superiority of lineups. Further, suggestibility of showups is believed to produce higher false-identification rates, but no experimental study has manipulated suggestibility. In this study, we manipulated suggestibility; 258 participants performed photo identification in a showup or lineup. The results revealed that the correct-identification rate was higher in the showups than the lineups, and the rate of dangerous false identification for the innocent suspect did not differ between showups and lineups. In lineups alone, the false-identification rate of the high-suggestibility condition was marginally higher than that of the low-suggestibility condition. The results indicate that suggestibility, which results from the preconception that the perpetrator must exist in the photos, increases false identifications in relative judgments, such as in lineups.

Copyright © 2016 The Japanese Psychological Association


Language: ja

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print