Citation

Reidy DE, Berke DS, Gentile B, Zeichner A. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2014; 68: 160-164.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.021

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Research on gender roles suggests that men who strongly adhere to traditional masculine gender norms are at increased risk for the perpetration of violent and abusive acts toward their female intimate partners. Yet, gender norms alone fail to provide a comprehensive explanation of the multifaceted construct of intimate partner violence (IPV) and there is theoretical reason to suspect that men who fail to conform to masculine roles may equally be at risk for IPV. In the present study, we assessed effect of masculine discrepancy stress, a form of distress arising from perceived failure to conform to socially-prescribed masculine gender role norms, on IPV. Six-hundred men completed online surveys assessing their experience of discrepancy stress, masculine gender role norms, and history of IPV.

RESULTS indicated that masculine discrepancy stress significantly predicted men's historical perpetration of IPV independent of other masculinity related variables.

FINDINGS are discussed in terms of potential distress engendered by masculine socialization as well as putative implications of gender role discrepancy stress for understanding and intervening in partner violence perpetrated by men.