Citation

Landman A, Teich JM, Pruitt P, Moore SE, Theriault J, Dorisca E, Harris S, Crim H, Lurie N, Goralnick E. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2014; 66(1): 51-59.

Affiliation

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; National Preparedness Leadership Initiative, Cambridge, MA; Partners Healthcare Emergency Preparedness, Boston, MA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, American College of Emergency Physicians, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.009

PMID

24997562

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) information systems are designed to support efficient and safe emergency care. These same systems often play a critical role in disasters to facilitate real-time situation awareness, information management, and communication. In this article, we describe one ED's experiences with ED information systems during the April 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. During postevent debriefings, staff shared that our ED information systems and workflow did not optimally support this incident; we found challenges with our unidentified patient naming convention, real-time situational awareness of patient location, and documentation of assessments, orders, and procedures. As a result, before our next mass gathering event, we changed our unidentified patient naming convention to more clearly distinguish multiple, simultaneous, unidentified patients. We also made changes to the disaster registration workflow and enhanced roles and responsibilities for updating electronic systems. Health systems should conduct disaster drills using their ED information systems to identify inefficiencies before an actual incident. ED information systems may require enhancements to better support disasters. Newer technologies, such as radiofrequency identification, could further improve disaster information management and communication but require careful evaluation and implementation into daily ED workflow.

Language: en