Citation

Goldsmith BE. Def. Peace Econ. 2013; 24(6): 555-578.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/10242694.2013.763637

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Although study of the relationship between international trade and militarized conflict has become more sophisticated, whether trade reduces the chance of conflict, exacerbates it, or has no effect, remains contested. Integrating expectations from schools of thought often portrayed as incompatible, I consider two aspects of trade - volume and interdependence - and model conflict as a two-stage process involving onset and escalation. This perspective leads to robust statistical findings that trade is Janus-faced, both facilitating and inhibiting conflict at different stages, supporting the conclusion that a focus on international conflict as a communication process promises better theory in international relations.