Citation

Reiss AJ, Rhodes A. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1961; 26(5): 720-732.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1961, American Sociological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

There is no simple relationship between ascribed social status and delinquency. Both the status structure of the residential community and the extent to which delinquency is a function of a cultural tradition in a residential community affect the delinquency life-chances of a boy at each ascribed social class level. The largest proportion of delinquents for any status group comes from the more homogeneous status areas for that group, while the delinquency life-chances of boys in any status group tend to be greatest in the lower status areas and in high delinquency rate areas. Evidence presented in the paper for types of conforming and deviating boys lend support to the conclusions that (1) there is more frequent and serious delinquent deviation in the lower than in the middle stratum when self-reports of delinquent deviation are examined, (2) that the career oriented delinquent is found only among lower class boys, (3) that the major type of lower status boy is a conforming non-achiever while the conforming achiever is the major type in the middle class, (4) that conformers are more likely to be isolates than are non-conformers, and (5) that peer-oriented delinquency is the most common form of delinquent organization at both lower and middle status levels. (Abstract Adapted from Source: American Sociological Review, 1961. Copyright © 1961 by the American Sociological Association)

Male Delinquency
Male Offender
Juvenile Male
Juvenile Delinquency
Juvenile Offender
Class Factors
Social Class
Social Organization
Delinquency Causes
07-02