Citation

Lamberty GJ, Nelson NW, Yamada T. Behav. Sci. Law 2013; 31(6): 814-832.

Affiliation

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Mental Health Service, Minneapolis, MN.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.2091

PMID

24105940

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a prominent public health problem in both civilian and military settings. This article discusses similarities and differences in the assessment and treatment of TBI and the attendant forensic implications. Acute care and management of moderate/severe TBI tend to be similar across environments, as is the recognition of disability status in affected individuals. By contrast, an increased focus on mild TBI in recent years has resulted in a reliance on self-report and screening measures to validate the occurrence of events leading to injury. This has complicated assessment, treatment and subsequent medicolegal proceedings. The neuropsychological literature has provided significant guidance on these difficult issues, although the complexity of disability adjudication for active duty members of the military and veterans continues to pose challenges for clinicians in evaluative and treatment contexts. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Language: en