Citation

Choo HY. Gender Soc. 2013; 27(4): 445-468.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0891243213483896

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Theories of citizenship have largely focused on the provision of rights by law and policy measures, as if rights are universally beneficial and cost-free and the invitations of rights will be accepted once offered. I challenge this assumption and highlight the need to empirically address how people negotiate with the benefit and cost of claiming rights. Based on ethnographic research in South Korea, this article delves into the everyday lives of migrant women in two feminized sectors of migration--cross-border marriage and sexual commerce--to situate the act of claiming rights in relation to the gendered pursuit of moral respect. I show that feminist groups in South Korea relied on the discourse of victimization and trafficking in pressuring the South Korean state to account for the human rights of migrant wives and migrant hostesses, while reinforcing the moral hierarchy that renders problematic migrant women's work and intimate relationships. I argue that the distinctive material and moral costs that accompanied human rights-based provisions compelled migrant wives and hostesses to pursue divergent paths in seeking alternate bases to citizenship that would support their inclusion as moral equals.

Language: en