Citation

LaBrie JW, Earleywine M, Lamb T, Shelesky K. Addict. Behav. 2006; 31(12): 2334-2338.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA. jlabrie@lmu.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.004

PMID

16626878

Abstract

Electronic versions of questionnaires have the potential to improve research and interventions in the addictions. Administering questionnaires electronically to groups, however, has proven difficult without a multitude of computers, but gathering data electronically from a group could make for easy assessment and quick feedback. Using a sample of 107 college students, we examined the validity of wireless keypad survey responses by comparing them to traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires. The two formats led to almost identical responses that did not differ significantly from each other (all effect sizes less than g=.15) and high correlations between formats. The wireless, handheld keypad procedure appears to generate data that are as valid as questionnaire responses and permit rapid feedback to groups, as well as easy, human error-free data entry for analysis.

Language: en