Citation

Leighton C. Health Policy Plann. 1995; 10(3): 213-222.

Affiliation

Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, Oxford University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10151840

Abstract

Three broad strategies for health financing reform include: 1) cost recovery through user fees to expand access and improve quality of health services along with means testing to increase equity; 2) reallocation of existing resources to improve efficiency and access; and 3) assessment of the efficiency and quality of private health providers for making better use of the private sector in expanding access to quality health services. Research on the extent to which cost recovery reforms have improved access showed mixed results. A 1993 survey of more than 50 user fee experiences in Africa showed that in roughly half the cases, utilization either remained the same or decreased, whereas in the other cases, utilization increased after fees were introduced. Pilot tests of alternative cost recovery methods in 1993 and 1994 in rural Niger provided strong evidence that some form of social financing or risk-sharing mechanism may have advantages over pure fee-for-service methods in rural Africa. The main reason user fees are believed to be inequitable is that new or increased prices may provide a stronger disincentive to the poor than to the better-off. Informal means testing in Niger suggested that even moderately effective means testing can play a positive role for other incentives to utilization by the poor. A study identified specific measures of structure, process, and outcomes to assess quality improvement in 18 rural primary health care facilities involved in the Niger cost recovery pilot tests. Reallocation of existing resources to improve cost-effectiveness represents the second principle type of health financing reform. Private providers also play a role in promoting access in Sub-Saharan countries. Public and private sector efficiency in Senegal was also examined. Household spending to promote efficiency suggested that people could allocate money for health care more efficiently. Finally, some policy research needs were identified.

Language: en