Citation

Gallagher JJ, Rooney R, Campbell S. Early Child Res. Q. 1999; 14(3): 313-333.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00015-0

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study analyzed the child care rules and regulations from the four states that had previously been reviewed under the Child Care, Cost & Quality study. Child day care regulations for each of the states were analyzed through rubrics designed by the investigators in the domains of structure, operations, personnel, and context. A separate analysis was done comparing regulations for protecting the child versus regulations for enhancing child development. The four states were in general agreement in setting higher standards for child protection than for the enhancement of development. Such regulations support the image of child care programs being a "safe haven" rather than a "development enhancer." The limited requirements for child care personnel and for community interaction also encourage that image. These minimum standards departed substantially from professional judgments about what is needed in child care settings. The authors proposed higher personnel standards, greater explicit emphasis on developmental enhancement, and more required interaction with parents and community contact.