SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Koch PB. Am. J. Sex. Educ. 2006; 1(3): 51-72.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1300/J455v01n03_04

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the level of college men's understanding about women's bodies (i.e., reproductive anatomy and physiology) in order to structure learning experiences of most relevance and interest to them. A grounded theory research design, using the constant comparative method, was used in order to gain a deeper understanding of young men's perspectives. Fifteen undergraduate males participated in three separate focus groups. The core variable that emerged was that women (and their bodies) are complex ?puzzles? that are difficult to understand. Ignorance about women's bodies, particularly their genital/reproductive anatomy and menstruation, was a major theme. A range of negative attitudes towards menstruation was expressed. Confusion over how to deal with women's body image was another major theme. The men believed that women are too concerned with and negative about their body image. Some of the men acknowledged that they may contribute to the societal influences that influence women to feel negatively about their bodies. Most of the men felt that having some basic knowledge of women's bodies, and the experiences that they go through, would improve their relationships with women. The findings call for an integrative, holistic approach to teaching about women's bodies that includes the cognitive, affective, and behavioral domains of learning.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print