SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Shaner S, Brooks C, Osborn R, Hull M, Falcone RE. Air Med. J. 1995; 14(1): 30-32.

Affiliation

SkyMed, Ohio State University Hospitals, Columbus.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10140976

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether flight crew personnel are physically fit in comparison to published standards for the average American adult. SETTING: The study group consisted of pilots, paramedics and nurses in two similarly configured and geographically located rotor-wing air medical transport programs. METHODS: A physical fitness assessment of flight crew members was conducted. The results were compared with published standards for average adult males and females (AVG). Percentage of fat in body composition (FM%), aerobic fitness (VO2MAX), muscular endurance (ME), muscular strength (MS) and flexibility (FL) measurements were obtained using accepted testing methods. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 29 male and 21 female individuals. The following were their mean scores. Males averaged: pFAT = 19% (AVG = 20.0%); VO2MAX = 41.0 (AVG = 42.5); ME = 37.0 (AVG = 28.5); MS = 125.0 (AVG = 86.5); FL = 5.2 (AVG = 1.4); Females averaged: pFAT = 28.0% (AVG = 26.5%); VO2MAX (AVG = 34.0); ME = 27.0 (AVG = 21.0); MS = 83.0 (AVG = 76.5); FL = 4.5 (AVG = 3.4). CONCLUSION: These baseline data suggest the study population of air medical flight crew was physically fit compared to the average American adult.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print