Citation

Miller AG, Gordon AK, Buddie AM. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1999; 3(3): 254-268.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA. millerag@muohio.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_8

PMID

15661676

Abstract

Analysts of evil and violence express the concern that to explain harmdoing may result in a condoning attitude toward perpetrators. An examination of research relevant to this hypothesis suggests that there are a variety of cognitive and affective processes that may produce a relatively condoning attitude toward perpetrators as a result of explaining their actions. Evidence from 3 exploratory studies supported the exonerating effects of explanations. Participants generating explicit explanations of harmdoing displayed a more condoning attitude toward pelpetrators than did those forming impressions of perpetrators without first explaining the acts. Participants reading social-psychological explanations of harmdoing also judged the researcher to be more condoning of perpetrators than those reading dispositional explanations of the same behavior. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Language: en