SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kinne J, Melzig-Thiel R. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 1996; 4(1): 53-56.

Affiliation

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Department 5, Dresden, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, National Institute of Public Health [Czech Republic], Publisher TIGIS)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8996672

Abstract

he use of mechanical models of the human hand-arm system in test stands can substitute man in several activities with exposition to vibration. An example is prototype testing of percussion drills. Modelling should be based on ascertained mean impedance curves of the hand-arm system. The method chosen was deriving curves for the three directions by using DIN and ISO standards (such as DIN 45677) as well as comprehensive literature and results of own measurements. At present it can be stated that: Literature is scarce especially with regard to the test conditions. Thus the causes of--sometimes largely--varying test results are difficult or impossible to be traced. There is conformity with the standards in principle. However, deviations exist for the frequency range determining the aw-value so that the application of mean standard curves for modelling the hand-arm system can lead to mistakes compared to test persons. Literature clearly shows an influence of hand grip force on the impedance curves. Standardisation seems not to consider this influence sufficiently. Mechanical models should take it into account. For feed force, there is no evidence for such a clear influence on the impedance curves.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print