Citation

Loughlin G. New Blackfriars 2007; 88(1017): 600-609.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1741-2005.2007.00173.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

I offer a brief outline of The Beauty of the Infinite, pointing up its similarities with and differences from John Milbank'sTheology and Social Theory (1990), and the violence of its rhetoric. I then take issue with Hart's reading of Nicholas Lash on the death and resurrection of Christ. I argue that not only is Lash closer to Hart than Hart allows, but that Lash recognizes the necessarily unfinished nature of Christian story telling. Hart is led by his rhetoric of out-narration to affirm an unsustainable completeness that elides the terrors of suffering and death, the very fault for which Hart chides Lash. Having noted Hart's misdirection I conclude with an appreciation of his aesthetics.