Citation

Scalora MJ, Baumgartner JV, Plank GL. Behav. Sci. Law 2003; 21(2): 239-249.

Affiliation

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0308, USA. mscalora1@unl.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.525

PMID

12645047

Abstract

Research in the burgeoning field of threat assessment has illuminated the importance of mental illness factors when considering risk of targeted violence-particularly related to government agencies and officials. The authors analyzed 127 cases investigated by a state law enforcement agency regarding threatening or other contacts toward public officials or state agency employees prompting security intervention. Univariate and discriminant analysis indicated that mentally ill subjects were significantly more likely to engage in more contacts as well as to make specific demands during such contacts. Mentally ill subjects were also more likely to articulate help-seeking concerns and employ religious themes, as opposed to using insulting, degrading, or ominous language toward the target or issuing complaints regarding policy issues. Contrary to other research, the mentally ill subjects within this sample were not significantly more likely to engage in approach behavior, a threshold for higher risk of violence. Implications for threat assessment activity are discussed.

Language: en