Citation

Aharoni E, Weintraub LL, Fridlund AJ. Behav. Sci. Law 2007; 25(6): 869-889.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. aharoni@psych.ucsb.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/bsl.790

PMID

18046738

Abstract

When deciding a criminal's punishment, people typically exhibit both retributive and consequentialist motives in their decision making, though retribution's role may be stronger. This study aimed to discern possible functions of retribution by examining a population predicted to be deficient in retributive drive. Participants who rated either high or low in psychopathic traits read stories about a homicide. These stories were designed to evoke both retribution and the consequentialist motive of behavior control by varying, respectively, criminal intent and likelihood of recidivism. The participants then recommended a length of confinement for the offender. Individuals high in psychopathic traits were uniquely insensitive to retributive cues, and they were particularly consequentialist in their punishment of criminal offenders. These results clarify aspects of psychopathic aggression and corroborate the hypothesis that retribution may stabilize cooperative behavior.

Language: en