SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Holmes N, Gifford SM. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Public Health 1997; 21(1): 11-16.

Affiliation

Department of Applied Chemistry, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Vic.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1997, Public Health Association of Australia, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9141722

Abstract

Risk and its control are important themes in occupational health and safety. In the current regulatory framework, risk is conceptualised as a probabilistic expression of hazard potential. However, social meanings of risk in the workplace may be different. The social context of work shapes the ways that risk is understood in the workplace, yet little research in occupational health and safety acknowledges it. A few studies of risk have used qualitative research methods to elicit understandings of risk at work; however, little research explores the experiences of both employers and employees. This study describes the narratives of risk in occupational health and safety of employers and employees in the Victorian painting industry. Using ethnographic methods, we collected data about the contexts in which risk is experienced and the sources of risk that each group identifies. These narratives reveal that risk in the painting industry is constructed through the interactions of three factors: the social context, the hierarchical structure of the industry and the shared assumptions about risk control through the individual skills and responsibilities. The narratives explain why occupational health and safety strategies focusing solely on individual behaviour change or technical measures will be unsuccessful.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print