Citation

Conus P, McGorry PD. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Psychiatry 2002; 36(2): 158-172.

Affiliation

Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, Parville, Victoria, Australia. conusmichaelis@bigpond.com

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11982536

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While first-episode (FE) psychosis has become an important field of research, FE affective psychoses, and mania in particular, have been relatively neglected. This paper summarizes current knowledge about FE mania and explores the potential for early intervention. METHOD: The main computerized psychiatric literature databases were accessed. RESULTS: When functional as well as symptomatic variables are considered, the outcome of mania is not as good as was formerly believed, a characteristic which is already present from the first episode. Various factors (lower socio-economic status, younger age at onset of illness, poor adherence to treatment, presence of comorbidity) have been identified as possible predictors of poor outcome. The prognostic value of the presence of psychotic symptoms and their congruence to mood, as well as the diagnostic subgroup, is less well established. This literature review also reveals striking similarities between manic and schizophreniform first episodes. Poor functional outcome in a significant proportion of patients following the first episode, high risk of suicide, high prevalence of comorbid diagnoses, worse outcome with a younger age at onset and with longer delay until treatment is initiated, and finally early presence of neuro-anatomical changes, are observed in both syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: This pattern justifies the development of early intervention strategies for FE manic patients and supports more exploratory research to identify prodromal symptoms, which might ultimately lead to even earlier focus on preventive interventions.

Language: en