Citation

Melamed Y, Elizur A, Kimchi R. Harefuah 1994; 126(8): 475-81, 491.

Affiliation

Abarbanel Mental Health Center, Bat Yam.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1994, Israel Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8070729

Abstract

Legal responsibility for the mentally ill has long been a dilemma. Public opinion with regard to the current law, which holds that the mentally ill are not responsible for their actions, is divided. We assessed 30 cases of psychiatric patients committed by court order following a criminal act. No relation was found between the nature of the transgression and the nature or seriousness of the psychiatric disorder. Interestingly, those who committed the more serious crimes, such as murder, usually had committed fewer criminal acts in the past. The functioning of the psychiatric committees in charge of releasing patients committed by court order has improved substantially under the new law for the treatment of the mentally ill. They now assess patients with considerably greater frequency. The reports to the courts of examining physicians tend to be general, with little attempt to differentiate ability to stand trial and responsibility for actions. On the other hand, treating physicians relate mainly to the patient's illness, rather than to the crime for which he was committed.

Language: he