Citation

Weed HG. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1993; 22(2): 220-224.

Affiliation

Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1993, American College of Emergency Physicians, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

8427435

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate wound infection in nonvenomous snakebite. DESIGN: Prospective clinical series. SETTING: Massachusetts Poison Control System. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two consecutive children and adults with nonenvenomated snakebite wounds. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were examined and advised that there was no published clinical evidence that prophylactic antibiotics were beneficial for nonenvenomated snakebites. They were re-examined five to ten days after the bite. MAIN RESULTS: Four patients used prophylactic antibiotics; 68 did not. There were no wound infections. Plain radiographs revealed a snake tooth fragment in the persistently tender wound of one patient bitten by his pet python. CONCLUSION: Despite reports that pathogenic bacteria can be isolated from snakes' mouths, nonenvenomated snakebites in Massachusetts usually do not require prophylactic antibiotic therapy. Radiography is occasionally indicated for persistently tender wounds inflicted by large snakes.

Language: en