SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ, Begun FP. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1992; 29(6): 579-584.

Affiliation

Department of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1466557

Abstract

In 4 men with self-inflicted penile amputation, replantation was successful using microsurgical technique. Postoperative complications were minimal. In 1 man who had amputated his penis and then amputated his scrotum and testicles, a small skin graft was necessary to close a portion of the defect. A mild urethral stricture that developed in this man responded to dilation. Return of sensation was excellent. Normal erections were reported by all men. Microsurgical replantation is the treatment of choice for this injury and is superior to other techniques of penile reattachment, which have a high incidence of distal necrosis, fistula and stricture formation, as well as incomplete or absent sensation and compromised erectile function. Of concern in this group of men is the high incidence of previous or subsequent penile mutilation. Two of the 4 men have a history of recurrent self-mutilation. The follow-up in this series is longer than previously reported and the overall psychiatric pathology appears to be quite severe and persistent.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print