Citation

Cazenave NA, Maddern DA. Race Soc. 1999; 2(1): 25-50.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/S1090-9524(00)00003-6

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The structures and processes of curriculum censorship are a microcosm of the racial organization and dynamics of America and other modern societies. They offer valuable insights into how the issue of systemic white racism is kept off organizational agendas. Whether successful or unsuccessful, censorship efforts typically become visible only in those rare instances when they are challenged publicly. In this paper arguments made against and for an intensely opposed "White Racism" course are examined to delineate the relationship between power, voice, and social change. This curriculum conflict is the analytical vehicle through which we explore the role of race-defensive denial in the persistence of systemic white racism. This case study also reveals effective ways of overcoming such denial and placing white racism at the center of social discourse.