SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Buckingham RS, Whitwell KJ, Lee RB. Optometry 2001; 72(10): 653-660.

Affiliation

US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Providing Ground, Maryland, USA. robertbuckingham@ferris.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2001, American Optometric Association, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11712633

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Army Safety Center, U.S. Navy Safety Center, and U.S. Air Force Safety Center collect data on occupational injuries that occur in each respective military service. METHODS: An 11-year retrospective study of ground eye injuries collected by the Army Safety Center, Navy Safety Center, and Air Force Safety Center, from Fiscal Year (FY) 1988 through FY 1998 was performed. Demographic data analyzed included rank, gender, age, and military/civilian status. Injury data analyzed included severity of injury, eye protection use, injury cost, work days lost due to injury, and days hospitalized due to injury. RESULTS: Statistics for Department of Defense (DoD) eye injuries indicate the average military individual who sustains an eye injury is a 20- to 24-year-old male, E3-E5. This individual is not wearing eye protection and will lose an average of 5.9 days from work at a cost averaging $6,295. The average civil service employee who sustains an eye injury is a WG6-10 who is a 30- to 39-year-old male. This individual is not wearing eye protection and will lose an average of 3.5 days from work at a cost averaging $1,598. Statistically significant differences in the numbers of eye injuries were observed between military occupational groups. In addition, incidence rates between military occupational groups were statistically significant. Category 1, Infantry, Gun Crews, and Seamanship Specialists, has the highest count of injuries and Category 7, Craftsworkers, has the highest incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive vision conservation education at local levels needs to focus on these military occupational groups.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print