SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Santago AC, Cormier JM, Duma SM, Yoganandan NA, Pintar FA. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 2008; 44: 201-206.

Affiliation

Virgina Tech - Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Instrument Society of America)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19141916

Abstract

The increase in upper extremity injuries in automobile collisions, because of the widespread implantation of airbags, has lead to a better understanding of forearm injury criteria. Risk functions for upper extremity injury that can be used in instrumented upper extremities would be useful. This paper presents a risk function for forearm injury for the 50th percentile male based on bending fracture moment data gathered from previous studies. The data was scaled using two scaling factors, one for orientation and one for mass, and the Weibull survival analysis model was then used to develop the risk function. It was determined that a 25% risk of injury corresponds to an 82 Nm bending load, a 50% risk of injury corresponds to a 100 Nm bending load, and a 75% risk of injury corresponds to a 117 Nm bending load. It is believed the risk function can be used with an instrumented upper extremity during vehicle testing.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print