Citation

Hansson P, Juslin P, Winman A. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2008; 34(5): 1027-1042.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. patrik.hansson@psy.umu.se

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/a0012638

PMID

18763889

Abstract

Research with general knowledge items demonstrates extreme overconfidence when people estimate confidence intervals for unknown quantities, but close to zero overconfidence when the same intervals are assessed by probability judgment. In 3 experiments, the authors investigated if the overconfidence specific to confidence intervals derives from limited task experience or from short-term memory limitations. As predicted by the naive sampling model (P. Juslin, A. Winman,&P. Hansson, 2007), overconfidence with probability judgment is rapidly reduced by additional task experience, whereas overconfidence with intuitive confidence intervals is minimally affected even by extensive task experience. In contrast to the minor bias with probability judgment, the extreme overconfidence bias with intuitive confidence intervals is correlated with short-term memory capacity. The proposed interpretation is that increased task experience is not sufficient to cure the overconfidence with confidence intervals because it stems from short-term memory limitations.

Language: en