Citation

Vives-Cases C, La Parra Casado D. Gac. Sanit. 2008; 22(5): 451-456.

Affiliation

Department of Public Health, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. Department of Sociology II, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. carmen.vives@ua.es.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19000526

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the discourse of some members of the Spanish parliament (MPs) in the 2 years before the Gender Violence Act was passed in 2004 to examine how gender-based violence is construed when legal measures are proposed. METHODS: Ten members of six different parties of the Spanish parliament were interviewed between November 2002 and March 2003. Each interview was recorded and transcribed. A discourse analysis was performed with Atlas.ti 4.2. RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews showed a discourse that revolved around the victim's report as the main mechanism for the public authorities to intervene and try to end gender-based violence. The interviewees proposed the following steps to help victims to escape from violence: reporting violence to the police, the provision of victim protection, punishment of the perpetrator, and avoidance of problems and death through different measures (law, police, support services). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows how a major social problem and the mobilization of women and mass media have had several effects. One of these effects is that lawmakers have turned their attention to this social concern. A solution to this phenomenon is being sought through the mechanisms of the Spanish parliament (promoting changes in the law) and government (making more economic resources available). The public action proposed by the MPs interviewed focuses on reporting; their discourse does not include alternative options (or includes only vague options) for victims not reporting violence.

Language: en