Citation

Obeng K. Traffic Injury Prev. 2008; 9(3): 268-276.

Affiliation

Department of Economics and Transportation/Logistics, School of Business and Economics, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, USA. obengk@ncat.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389580802040311

PMID

18570150

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article examines injury severity in crashes that occur within signalized intersections and identifies some factors that explain them. METHOD: It uses a random effect ordered logit model and an unbalanced longitudinal panel data for 303 intersections for one medium-size city. RESULTS: Among its findings are 3% and 0.29% lower probabilities of sustaining evident and disabling injuries respectively when vehicle occupants wear three-point seat belts and corresponding 1.71% and 0.16% lower probabilities when they wear only shoulder belts. Also, the probabilities of sustaining evident and disabling injuries reduce by 0.87% and 0.08% when vehicles with airbags are involved in crashes. But, when front airbags deploy the probabilities of sustaining disabling, evident, and possible injuries increase by 1.3%, 11.93%, and 26.80%, respectively. Similarly, both side airbags deploying increases disabling and evident injuries by 1.8% and 15.53%, respectively. In addition, we find that the probability of sustaining severe injuries increases in head-on crashes. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the effectiveness of seat belt use, especially three-point seat belts, the inclusion of airbags in all vehicles, increased awareness of possible injuries from airbags deploying, signalized intersection designs that include pedestrian crossing signals, and additional research to identify the predominant types of injuries associated with airbags deploying.

Language: en