Citation

Zele AJ, Cao D, Pokorny J. Vision Res. 2007; 47(5): 608-611.

Affiliation

Visual Science Laboratories, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, 940 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.003

PMID

17240416

PMCID

PMC1847630

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare reaction time (RT) to rod incremental and decremental stimuli expressed in physical contrast units or psychophysical threshold units. METHODS: Rod contrast detection thresholds and suprathreshold RTs were measured for Rapid-On and Rapid-Off ramp stimuli. RESULTS: Threshold sensitivity to Rapid-Off stimuli was higher than to Rapid-On stimuli. Suprathreshold RTs specified in Weber contrast for Rapid-Off stimuli were shorter than for Rapid-On stimuli. Reaction time data expressed in multiples of threshold reversed the outcomes: Reaction times for Rapid-On stimuli were shorter than those for Rapid-Off stimuli. The use of alternative contrast metrics also failed to equate RTs. CONCLUSIONS: A case is made that the interpretation of RT data may be confounded when expressed in threshold units. Stimulus energy or contrast is the only metric common to the response characteristics of the cells underlying speeded responses. The use of threshold metrics for RT can confuse the interpretation of an underlying physiological process.

Language: en